If I come off as a "know-it-all" around here sometimes (often? LOL), believe me, I'm not. I learn things during research the same way readers find them out when I unearth the info in my posts. I like to think that I'm really
up on certain subjects, though, so when something sneaks by me it can be a big surprise. For example, I know that there have been multiple times when films helmed by "The Master of Suspense" Alfred Hitchcock have been remade. (The most prominent time in recent years coming in 1998 when Gus Van Sant did a virtual shot-for-shot remake of the 1960 classic
Psycho.) Even Hitch himself remade one of his hits.
The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934) was redone by him in 1956. Here is a little round-up of some of the re-dos by other folks (if I've forgotten any, I'm sure someone will make me aware.)
 |
1951's Strangers on a Train was remade (with a female villain - Carol Lynley wielding a harpoon!) as Once You Kiss a Stranger (1969.)
|
 |
Somehow foreign release posters always seemed to come up with something a bit more visually arresting... (Ben Affleck attempted another remake of this one with his Gone Girl, 2014, director David Fincher, but the project was abandoned in pre-production in 2015.)
|
 |
The Lady Vanishes (1938) was given a comedic spin in this 1979 fizzle.
|
 |
Dial M for Murder (1954) was redone for television in 1981.
|
 |
Some of the cast members "phoning" it in... Ha ha!
|
 |
One of his box office flops, Under Capricorn (1949), was redone as an Australian miniseries in 1983.
|
 |
Likewise, the lesser-known Jamaica Inn (1939) was expanded into a British miniseries in 1983 as well.
|
 |
Hitchcock's personal favorite of his films, Shadow of a Doubt (1943), was remade for TV in 1991 (with "Hitchcock Blonde" Tippi Hedren appearing as a victim.)
|
 |
This one had already been reworked in 1958 for Step Down to Terror.
|
 |
In 1992, the classic Cary Grant-Ingrid Bergman thriller Notorious (1946) was remade for TV.
|
 |
And in 1998, Rear Window (1954) was utilized as a project for Christopher Reeve, who'd been left disabled following a horseback-riding incident.
|
Needless to say, the vast majority of these remakes were more than pale next to the originals. This might be attributed to lower budgets, the absence of stars of the magnitude with whom Hitchcock preferred to work or just the dilution of (or tired reworking of) story lines that had once held moviegoers in thrall. Or maybe the times had changed a bit much for the plot to still work feasibly. Anyway... I knew that the aforementioned films had been made and I have seen most of them. But one sneaked by me! In no way, shape or form did I have any knowledge of one of Hitchcock's more prominent thrillers having been remade:
 |
1941's Suspicion had Joan Fontaine (of the prior year's smash hit Rebecca) being wooed by a suave Cary Grant who may or may not be planning to do her in! For a 1987 television remake, these iconic, unforgettable stars were replaced by...
|
 |
...Jane Curtin and Anthony Andrews.
|
 |
"Dial R for Remake."
|
 |
In the original, Grant suavely invades Fontaine's first class train compartment and talks his way out of being shunted into the general seating. Grant plays a charming, seemingly well-to-do man of standing while Fontaine is a bookish, very reserved young lady. She's got money, but isn't exactly overflowing with flash.
|
 |
I realize in the 1940s, when MGM "slums" tended to be cleaner than most suburban streets, that people were always presented looking rather polished, even when they were not meant to be. But my God! Ha ha ha!! Curtin is supposed to turn Andrews' head looking like this? (True, perhaps she's being targeted no matter what, but geesh...!)
|
 |
When next we see her, she's suddenly Auntie Mame at the hunt. (In an awkward plot adjustment, the flatly American Curtin is explained by her mother being married into a titled British family and her living there with them.)
|
 |
Andrews can hardly believe it's the same mouse he met on the train. She's made up, is sans eyeglasses (watch out for that ditch!) and she's dolled up in English riding togs.
|
 |
Soon enough thereafter, she's back to looking like Swamp Thing. In an amusing touch, this bookworm is seen leafing through a coffee table tome on the films of... Alfred Hitchcock!
|
 |
Curtin's mom in this is played by Betsy Blair, who knew a thing or two about de-glamorization. She played a very plain schoolteacher who wins the heart of Ernest Borgnine in Marty (1955) and was Oscar-nominated for it (losing to Jo Van Fleet in East of Eden.)
|
 |
Andrews tracks Curtin down and decides to accompany her to church, but at the last moment diverts her to a walk along the cliffs.
|
 |
As in the original, Curtin mistakes Andrews' actions as threatening and is afraid he's about to send her over the edge. But apparently that's not the case.
|
 |
In 1941, Grant playfully decides to redo Fontaine's hair and the moment has an amusing little pay-off.
|
 |
In 1988, Andrews decides he's going to redo Curtin's tresses and it is neither amusing, nor is it an improvement!
|
 |
Curtin's mother and stepfather (Michael Hordern of 007 movie fame) aren't sure about the company she's keeping. Hordern, in particular, just. does not approve of Andrews at all.
|
 |
And though Andrews undoubtedly has the veddy British bearing and demeanor down pat for this role, he simply cannot begin to engender the sort of appeal that Grant offered. Grant was a controversial choice for his role in the original because he was known more for light comedy and there was fear that audiences would reject any notion that he might have it in for Fontaine. With Andrews, no such speculation really matters, though one does wonder throughout this update if, 46 years later, audiences might be ready for the source novel's ending (which was not followed for the first film.)
|
 |
Curtin, on the flip side, was known chiefly for comedy,
so she was the one this time who welcomed the opportunity for something
different. In striving to avoid 1940s' Hollywood histrionics and the sort of mugging that could occur on a sitcom, she underplays much of her material. This lends an unintentional dullness to the proceedings and she calmly recites the vast majority of her lines.
|
 |
Anyway, Andrews crashes an elegant party and before long is sweeping Curtin off her feet.
|
 |
He takes her from the party and for a drive...
|
 |
...eventually winding up at her estate, where a looming portrait of her (step) father presides over the room.
|
 |
Next thing you know, they're married and honeymooning on the Orient Express.
|
 |
Once back, they move into a (truly hideous 1980s-remodeled) new home.
|
 |
And while we're never 100% sure exactly what it is Andrews does, he's got a pert young secretary on hand.
|
 |
Then comes an old pal of Andrews', Beaky Twaite, well cast and adeptly played by Jonathan Lynn.
|
 |
Nigel Bruce (of Dr. Watson fame) essayed this part the first time.
|
 |
Thanks to a series of lies and misrepresentations from Andrews, Curtin begins to suspect that Lynn may be the target of Andrews' financial desperation or worse!
|
 |
Just as her suspicions are near their highest, she and Lynn are playing Scrabble.
|
 |
She's forming words (apparently no longer needing those pesky eyeglasses!) and as she listens to her husband drone on, her imagination gets hold of her.
|
 |
This spells trouble... She places the word murder on the board, then collapses from a faint onto the floor! (There is no reason on earth for her to be wearing a huge, voluminous black skirt here except...
|
 |
That's what Fontaine had on when she hit the floor back in 1941, albeit in a dress. I'll give the director and crew of the remake credit for hitting this visual pretty closely to what happened during the first go 'round.
|
 |
Things just aren't going well and before it's all said and done, Curtin has taken to her bed.
|
 |
No one who's ever seen it could forget the sight of Grant coming up the spiral staircase, draped in shadows, with an ominous glass of milk which may or may not be poisoned. (Hitch lit the glass from inside with a battery-operated bulb in order to make it stand out.)
|
 |
Here, the moment is still given its ominous due, but there was just no way to compete with the original movie's treatment of it.
|
 |
The 1941 film's frenzied climax occurs with Grant driving like a maniac along a dangerous road with Fontaine fretful of being tossed out to her death. Yes, in this still photo, there are some "big" expressions going on.
|
 |
But I'll take those over the unintentionally funny ones being offered up in the 1987 edition...
|
 |
In fact, when it comes to the whole thing, I can't help but prefer the original and can't even grasp why anyone felt the need to remake it, especially if nothing was done along the way to enhance or improve it.
|
 |
I will stick to the classic rendition. But... If you should wish to experience this, it's available on Tubi, free with ads. I watched the whole thing through, wondering all along if they might update the ending, but I will leave that resolution to those who wish to find out for themselves.
|
 |
Though more than a few speculated that her loss the prior year for Rebecca (1940) contributed to it, Miss Fontaine took home an Oscar for Suspicion. That's not something that was ever in danger of happening to Curtin.
|
 |
That's not to suggest that Curtin was a slouch. At the time of Suspicion (which was actually an installment of American Playhouse), she had won two Emmys for her work on Kate & Allie with Susan St. James. (A third nomination was lost to Rue McClanahan of The Golden Girls.) A single Golden Globe nomination was lost to Shelley Long for Cheers.
|
 |
Prior to that, she'd been nominated twice for her performances on Saturday Night Live. (Losing once to Gilda Radner, the second time as part of the ensemble, she lost to Steve and Eydie Celebrate Irving Berlin!) Miss Curtin is now 77 and continues to work on screen.
|
 |
Stage actor Andrews appeared on Upstairs, Downstairs, among other programs, but first gained significant fame from costarring with Jeremy Irons in the landmark miniseries Brideshead Revisited. He won a Golden Globe for that and received an Emmy nomination as well, but that went to Mickey Rooney for Bill.
|
 |
The year after Suspicion, Andrews was put to very good use as Prince Edward (opposite Jane Seymour) in The Woman He Loved, which is most likely where I first saw him.
|
 |
It practically goes without saying that he is not "my" type, though there are doubtlessly fans who feel otherwise, so I include this pic. Now 77, he retired from the screen in 2020.
|
 |
Ta ta, for now, darlings!
|
De-glamorization! Hilarious term. Sounds like a new White House initiative. Speaking of WH, Curtain is in the new Ouzo Aduba series The Residency. It's pretty good. Some very funny moments. And she plays a WH shut-in. Your post makes me want to see the original Suspicion. If they remade it today, it would just be called Sus.
ReplyDeleteA great idea for a post. I had no idea there were so many remakes. I did see the Reeve “Rear Window” and wanted so much to enjoy it but, alas, it was just so lifeless.
ReplyDeleteI was probably spoiled. I saw the original when rereleased in the 80s. During the scene when Jeff is trapped alone in his apartment listening to the steady stomp of the man on his way to kill him, the entire theater was absolutely enrapt. I’ve never seen anything like it.
Trying to take Cary Grant’s place is a fool’s game. “Suspicion” is a perfect example of his ability to change from hero to (possible) villain with an arch of the eyebrow. Up until the very last minute, you’re just not sure about him.
I saw “Dial M” in 3D on the big screen. Fun, but I don’t really care for it. The plot is silly, the whole thing chatty and stage bound.
Remakes so rarely work, I think, because they offer nothing new, other than giving newer actors a chance at an established work. They’re like vanity projects. Hitchcock’s own remake of “TMWKTM” works spectacularly well because he tailored it to the talents of his lead actors.
Too, Hitchcock has a knack for inserting little bits of sometimes macabre humor in his movies, a talent few other directors seem to have.
I may have to check out a few of these, but I’ll pass on the Gould/Shepherd “Lady Vanishes”. Just thinking about that makes my head hurt.
Anthony and Jane are a very strange combination and worlds apart for me. I swooned over Brideshead like most 80's gays and tried to copy the clothes for years, so seeing Jane Curtin from SNL in this is surreals. She's great in the above mentioned "The Residence" which is good fun. I respect her career. There is a Gwyneth/Michael Dougls remake of, I think, "Dial M for Murder" with a different name that I love. Love the obscure posts and all the research.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the great post, Poseidon. The remakes are almost always worse. I loved Andrews in Brideshead, but not so much in later stuff. Jane Curtin has a wonderful supporting role in The Residence that's running right now on Netflix.
ReplyDeleteShawny, Sometimes I coin words (like "putrescent!") and sometimes I gather them from others. I can't take credit for "deglamorization" but I like it! LOL Some people, no matter what, are like Teflon when attempts are made to glam them up. I like the original "Suspicion" but can't ever guess what others might think. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteDan, I felt basically the same way about Reeve's RW. It was an ingenious way to keep him acting, but it just didn't come off. My life changed the year Hitch's "lost" films were re-released. Love them all (except "Harry." Couldn't get into that one.) I'm certain you would hate "The Lady Vanishes" with Elliott and Cybill. I tried to get through it for Ang, but...
Gingerguy, you are so right!!! See? I knew I'd forget something. "A Perfect Murder!" It was a "loose" remake of "Dial M." Viggo was in it, two years before he costarred in the "Psycho" remake. Thanks!!
A, I'm glad you liked this. I do try to keep things varied around here (though always wish I could post with more frequency.) Thank you!
Agree with you on “Harry”. It just seems to ramble on, never really amounting to anything. One of those movies that feels like they are making it up as they go along.
ReplyDelete...Only a passing reference to "Rebecca," also a Hitchcock film, of which there have been multiple remakes. This makes sense because it's literary source is so firmly established apart from Hitchcock, that remakes would have been inevitable. They were all multi-part, followed closely the novel, and mostly enjoyable. Faye Dunaway as Rebecca's older employer was memorably bitchy in one of them.
ReplyDeleteNarciso, my yes...! See, there's more I couldn't recall. And I've seen at least two of them! LOL Diana Rigg was Mrs. Danvers in one (and I rarely miss anything with Faye in it.) I recall a (truly bad) rendition which looked beautiful, but was all wrong. Armie Hammer was Max, who I adored. But, like *nearly* every contemporary actor who I've ever latched on to, he soon turned out to be a hot mess in real life. They are always crazy, canceled or both! LOL I love the novel Rebecca. Thanks!!
ReplyDeleteI can think of very few redos that are better or just as good as the first go-arounds. For instance the 1990 Night of the Living Dead and the 1998 A Perfect Murder (Dial M for Murder) come to mind as being quite good updated versions.
ReplyDeletePoor Tippi having to play bit parts in Shadow of a Doubt and The Birds 2 Lands End. How much I wonder can she really blame Hitchcock for her abysmal career and not because she had limited range (or made poor choices). She was quite good in The Birds and Marnie probably only because she was under the direction of Hitchcock (and I don't believe Hitchcock was a monster predator as described by Tippi).
Huttonmy710, I have to confess I am also highly skeptical of Tipster's claims. Not that I don't believe he had obsessions, and perhaps even one with her. But timing was suspect and I think it became quite enhanced. But, in any case, (and this is coming from someone who quite likes her!) her auto-bio was a massive let-down. I think she's a teensy bit nuts in general....
ReplyDeleteThank you for this fun and stimulating post. What can I say... Remaking Hitchcock's vehicles sounds like pure suicide to me. He was the Master of Suspense. All his films have a very discernible and tangible signature - interplays of light and shadow; menacing silences; a steadily growing sense of impending doom, the inevitability of fate, and the impossibility of love (especially at a certain age). To latch onto the bare bones of the story, thinking that one can "modernize" it and recreate it for today's audience, is somewhere between arrogance and sheer stupidity - as just about every film in the above article attests.
ReplyDeleteVery astute analysis. One could argue his movies, especially “North by Northwest”, are more style than substance. But when the style is that wonderfully entertaining, who cares?
Delete