Beginning around the late-'70s, moviegoers had begun flocking to a new genre of movie, the teen slasher flick.
Halloween (1978) was a low-budget monster hit with
Friday the 13th (1980) on its heels. Young mischief-makers found themselves on the receiving end of gory violence, often after having indulged in vices like pot and sex. Continuing the trend of incorporating significant dates or holidays into the equation, we also saw
New Years Evil (1980) and
My Bloody Valentine (1981.) But in 1984, the makers of
Silent Night, Deadly Night apparently went too far when they dared to set a slasher movie at Christmastime and had good ol' Santa Claus wielding an axe!
In an early example of the "cancel culture," which is now so prevalent, outraged parents flooded local malls and movie theaters, picketing and chanting Christmas carols in protest. The PTA became involved, demanding the removal of television ads for the film. It was quite a spectacle at the time and made news all over. (I recall the drubbing that Siskel & Ebert gave the movie on their weekly review program.) The parents did have a point that showing ads for a movie like this during
Little House on the Prairie (!) was a decidedly ignorant move. However, there had already been a movie with a highly similar theme -
You Better Watch Out, later called
Christmas Evil - in 1980, which had caused nary a ripple! It ended up with the movie - which had a very successful opening weekend - being yanked from screens after 10 days... At the time it was withdrawn, it had made more money that its competitor
A Nightmare on Elm Street. (Seeing people eviscerated, so long as it wasn't by Old St. Nick, was presumably not an issue...)
|
I was 17 when this movie came out, technically too young to see it without a parent or guardian, though God knows I slithered into Little Darlings (1980) at age 13! I was averse to horror movies in general back then, so I never did get to see it. Didn't really care to either! But recently one of my high-def movie channels put it out there and I thought it was time I took a look to see what all the fuss was about. I expected it to be utterly devoid of any sort of craftsmanship or quality in the slightest, but I was rather surprised at some of its aspects! It's not "good," but you don't go into a movie like this anticipating "Long Days Journey into Night" level of dramatics. LOL
|
|
We begin in Utah as a young family is shown driving cross country.
|
|
Demonstrating all the strenuous 1971 period detail of, say, 1984, the mother is sporting full-on '80s makeup, highlights, etc... The little boy in the backseat is reading a careworn copy of "The Night Before Christmas."
|
|
They're on their way to visit grandpa at the "home." Looks like a real rockin' place with, literally, no one around except for him! Inexplicably, the doctor wants to discuss Gramps' case, so the parents take their baby and leave the older son there all along with a catatonic old man...
|
|
No sooner are they alone than the grandfather begins a creepy tirade about Santa Claus and how he punishes those who aren't good!
|
|
Having witnessed none of this, the boy's parents are more than skeptical as he attempts to relay to them what happened during their long drive home.
|
|
Meanwhile, a man in a Santa suit (Charles Dierkop of Police Woman!) holds up a convenience store and thinks nothing of doing away with the clerk.
|
|
Petrified of Santa to begin with, the child is apoplectic when they come upon Dierkop in the road with a broken down car. His father feels he has to stop to see if he can help, which is a truly bad decision.
|
|
Before you know it, Dad is down for the count and Mom is being dragged into the street!
|
|
Sadly, although he makes a run for it and hides in some brush, the tyke is forced to witness the attempted rape and murder of his mother. Jonathan Best, who plays the lead at this age, gives really good face throughout and was a decent little actor. He wasn't yet 7 at the time of filming. He later worked for a time as a (mostly voice) actor in several Morman-oriented animated projects. Remember, this was filmed in Utah.
|
|
Three years later, we're at a Catholic-run orphanage.
|
|
Our protagonist was so affected by the events of 1971 that it turned his dark brown eyes pale green! LOL He is also sporting a very 1984 mullet/bi-level haircut in what is purportedly 1974...
|
|
He's called upon in class to tape his Christmas artwork on the board alongside other young students at the home/school. But his approach to it is decidedly different!
|
|
The Mother Superior (Lilyan Chauvin) is understandably alarmed by the very UN-Norman Rockwell-ish piece of art.
|
|
She and her assistant (Gilmer McCormick) discuss his peculiar case. He's clearly disturbed by the traumatic events of his early childhood. Chauvin takes a hard line with him while McCormick is more sympathetic.
|
|
The boy (now played by Danny Wagner) really isn't so much mischievous as hapless. For instance, he's merely walking down the hall on the way to recess when he hears oddball noises behind a door... (I think you can see some of the artful staging in scenes like this, with the keyhole light in his eye and the way the hallway is photographed and lit.)
|
|
Wagner is interrupted in his voyeurism by an irate Chauvin, who surprises the copulating couple who've holed up in a storeroom for some irresistible afternoon delight.
|
|
The startled couple looks like they were opting to "do it" on the set of Hogan's Heroes or something! Anyway, Chauvin soon takes a belt (!) to both of them.
|
|
Still fired up, she traipses out to the playground and calls young Wagner back in.
|
|
She proceeds to wallop him with the belt, too, for the sin of watching them do their thing.
|
|
One glance at this shot of the other orphans is all you need to know about the amateurish acting and un-detailed directing style of Charles Sellier Jr. Each kid has found a way to determine his or her own place to focus attention instead of on one unified thing! Sellier only directed two other features after this; Snowballing (1984, and, yes, it's about what you may think!) and The Annihilators, 1985), but he did create The Life and Times of Grizzly Adams and produced many, many projects up to 2008.
|
|
This coming not too long after Mommie Dearest (1981), there's an element of that feeling of a child trapped by a commanding adult. Chauvin takes to tying Wagner up in his bed!
|
|
Sympathetic McCormick can't convince her of any other route to success with the child. He really can't seem to catch a break!
|
|
Now it's Christmas and Chauvin has determined that the snot-nosed kids are becoming spoiled by so many presents.
|
|
Still, Santa pays his annual visit and Chauvin insists that Wagner take his turn with the old man, though he's violently against the idea. (Gee, I wonder why..!)
|
|
I don't even know why a Catholic-run orphanage is so all-fire big on Santa Claus, but nevertheless Wagner is crammed onto his lap. This results in Santa being punched in the face!
|
|
Yes, it's a little slice of hell at the school and Wagner is constantly put-upon by the domineering Mother Superior.
|
|
I didn't investigate it too thoroughly, but this is surely the only top-billed movie of Chauvin's career. The French actress was very busy for many years, but usually in uncredited bits or brief supporting parts. The only thing I ever really readily knew her from was Back Street (1961), in which she was a snidely gossiping airline ticket agent. But she was a highly active performer up until her death in 2008 at 82 from breast cancer and heart disease.
|
|
Now thirteen years after the initial incident, we're about to meet our boy all grown up.
|
|
McCormick is attempting to convince toy store owner Britt Leach to hire one of her young former charges as a stock clerk. The disbelieving Leach informs her that the job requires someone strong and hardy who can lift heavy boxes, not some orphan from her school.
|
|
She declares that the person she's trying to get hired is no weakling, but a nice, strong 18 year-old boy. She calls him to come around the corner and introduce himself...
|
|
This is our very first glimpse of the guy!
|
|
You're hired! Robert Brian Wilson is now portraying the lead (and has reverted to his dark brown eyes again...!)
|
|
Yes, please!
|
|
Wilson is a hard-working, milk-drinking model employee, much in contrast to his asshole coworker Randy Stumpf.
|
|
It's fun to examine the 1980s toys that are scattered throughout the store (though it NEVER looks like any of them are thoughtfully arranged or categorized. They're just piled here and there.)
|
|
Wilson does a good job, is responsible and is well-liked. But if you take notice, there are Halloween costumes hanging... November is on the horizon. And, after that...
|
|
Ho Ho No!!
|
|
He has noticeable discomfort at the sight of the man in the red velvet suit.
|
|
Apart from the specter of Santa Claus on the horizon, he's doing all right and has developed a bit of a crush on one of his female coworkers.
|
|
She seems like a caring enough person and takes an interest in him as well.
|
|
Here, in a (wet?) dream, Wilson fantasizes about what it would be like to create the two-headed monster with his pert coworker.
|
|
Santa might be trimmed in white fur, but Wilson is quite the opposite. The camera glides by his remarkably hairy backside!
|
|
Comfy as they seem, this dream does not have a happy ending. Wilson, thanks to the horrible events of his childhood, equates sex with violence and as an evil act that requires punishment!
|
|
He awakens in a state of panic.
|
|
And he cannot hide his horror at seeing a real live Santa on hand for the annual visits with the local kiddies.
|
|
No, that's not the mother of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. Just some unfortunate camera framing as one of the store employees informs Leach that the Santa Claus they are relying on will not be in that day! She suggests that he fill in the part himself, but he is aghast at the notion.
|
|
For some reason, instead of calling upon the slightly older and huskier Stumpf to do it, Leach asks Wilson to become the fill-in Santa Claus at the store!
|
|
It's almost more than he can bear, but the eager-to-please Wilson acquiesces.
|
|
This can't end well, can it?
|
|
All the rugrats are lined up and we get to watch the one at extreme right pick her nose while waiting for her turn...
|
|
In a dazzling display of what hair and fashion trends were "it" in 1984 Utah, we have this series of moms (and dads) overlooking the situation.
|
|
Wilson's "sleigh-side" manner leaves plenty to be desired, but he gets through the damned thing unscathed.
|
|
Trouble is, that night is the store Christmas party and Leach practically insists that Wilson have some wine along with everyone else.
|
|
The heady mix of alcohol, the Santa experience, his burgeoning sexuality and so on becomes a simmering cauldron of confusion and outrage, especially when his favorite coworker begins to play tongue-hockey with the other jerk he works with... He begins to snap.
|
|
Next thing you know, no naughty boys or girls are safe in town!
|
|
This was apparently acceptable winter clothing for young bimbo Linnea Quigley (who opens the door topless when trying to retrieve her wayward cat!) Quigley would go on to countless appearances in exploitation fare with titties titles like Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers (1988), Vice Academy (1989) and Virgin High (1991) to name only a few. I won't go on and on with the slew of killings that come here and thereafter, but there are plenty. Some of them are creative. Some were considered gruesome enough to edit in order to secure a R rating.
|
|
As I say, my expectations were virtually nil, so I was actually pleasantly surprised at the caliber of the photography and some of the depth - such as it is - to the story line. The hubbub seems almost unbelievable now that we've had so many other, far more reprehensible, pieces of cinematic excrement come down the movie chute. (The story is really just a warped variation on the origin of The Lone Ranger or Batman - a youth witnesses the death of his parents and it leads to costumed retribution of a sort.) This movie's notoriety led to a series of sequels and a later reexamination (with grainy, restored footage in some parts on the Blu-Ray), emerging as a maligned cult favorite. As to the shot above, these carolers are singing a hooty number written just for this project. It's only one of many songs provided throughout with ironic titles like "Slayrider," "Santa's Watching" and "The Warm Side of the Door." The movie may be viewed here.
|
|
If Gilmer McCormick seemed at all familiar to you, it may be because she was one of the original stars on Broadway of the musical Godspell and reprised the part in the 1973 movie. She only worked on screen once more after this (as a guest on the obscure TV series I Had Three Wives, which starred Victor Garber, her Jesus in Godspell.) She segued into teaching acting along with directing theater and is 74 today.
|
|
All the while Wilson was on his Santa spree, he reminded me of someone, but I couldn't quite put my finger on it. Finally I decided it was likely televangelist Jan Crouch! Having this ostensibly successful film - his debut - yanked the way it was must have been crushing to young Wilson, but he managed to forge ahead on daytime soaps such as Generations and Santa Barbara. In the 1990s he married, eventually becoming a father of three, and moved into the trade show business. Which brings us to...
|
|
The End!
|
As always, thanks for all the info. Coincidentally, I started watching this last week and quickly switched to fast forward looking for sex scenes or shirtless men, as one does.
ReplyDeleteNever understood the appeal of slasher movies, although this has one thing going for it - looks to be about a 6’ something. I’ve only seen bits and pieces of this type of movie, and though they may be shocking, I don’t really find them scary. Give me films like “Cat People”, “The Haunting”, and “Night of the Hunter”, which let your imagination do much of the work.
ReplyDeleteAnother great post, Poseidon! I, too, was a bit traumatized by those Halloween/Friday the 13th/Elm Street films in high school, so having a synopsis that avoids the gory bits is much appreciated. My big take-away, however, was: the photos Robert Brian Wilson remind me of a young Guy Stockwell. Shame we didn’t get to see more of him over the years.
ReplyDeleteThanks for another wonderful year of cinema-related facts and fun! Happy holidays, you kind, witty, and generous soul!
Ho ho no! This was great. I was musing today while driving about Christmas horror movies, and the one with Margot Kidder"Black Christmas ". This movie and "Carnival of Souls" are the only two Utah set horror I can think of, but wonder if there are more? A sub genre. Linnea Quigley is one of my big regrets, over the years I've lent things out and not gotten them back. Linnea Quigley did a hilarious video called "Scream Queen" which featured her talents, the right and the left one, and her fabulous scream. I will get a chance to watch this movie this week, thanks for the link and the low down.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely "Yes Please!"
ReplyDeleteThanks again, Poseidon!
The views of Robert Brian Wilson are quite a nice little treat in my Christmas stocking!
ReplyDeleteLilyan Chauvin had one fairly large role other than this, third-billed in LOST, LONELY AND VICIOUS (1958), a James Dean knockoff where she's his drama coach/"older woman" love interest who tries-- and fails-- to save him from his self-destructive inner demons.
She's presented as a Garbo knockoff herself, down to the NINOTCHKA hairstyle-- though one review of a DVD release picked up on the floppy cloche hat she wears in one scene and said she looked like she was channeling the Gorton's fisherman!
A decent print is available on the Internet Archive, if you care to wade through a Howco production with Ed Wood-level supporting performances:
https://archive.org/details/Lost_Lonely_and_Vicious_1958/Lost_Lonely_and_Vicious.avi
Lead actor Ken Clayton is a nice treat for the eye himself-- and oddly enough, fairly strongly resembles SILENT NIGHT DEADLY NIGHT star Robert Brian Wilson!
Thanks for all you do for us, Poseidon! You're such a bright, happy spot in the gloom!
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays, everyone! And wishes for a prosperous, happy and healthy New Year for all!
RBW was very yummy eye candy back in the day & he has a terrific backside (at least back in the day - he may be just as delipidated now as i am LOL)
ReplyDeletehe is definitely the type i would have chased to hook up with if we had ever met at a club, etc.
he reminds me a lot of "steven" from "dynasty" (the first steven - al corley?)
thanks for posting :)
I suspect the fuss over this one was because of stealing the title of a carol.
ReplyDeleteI love the details you notice: in the scene where he has anachronistic hair all the other kids have do's you could have had in the seventies so quite how they let that through on the lead is a mystery!
And such a nice bum.
To be totally honest, while they weren't known as "mullets" at the time, that hairstyle did exist in the early '70s-- check old pictures of David Bowie and other rock stars.
ReplyDeleteWhether or not they were commonplace enough to filter down to a kid in an orphanage is another issue, I guess, but they weren't *totally* anachronistic back then.
Much earlier, in 1972, we got what could be the first Xmas slasher courtesy of Aaron Spelling. "Home for the Holidays" was made for TV and starred Sally Field and Jessica Walter. Daughters come back to the family mansion only to be picked off by a rake-wielding psycho. And it was made for TV. So it has three trivia-worthy elements: It's a Christmas horror slasher that predates others by many years, was made for TV, and came from Spelling. I tell people about it now, and they look at me like I dreamed it. But it's on YouTube.
ReplyDeleteWe went to this film expecting a gleeful hate-watch, but the opening section was pretty genuinely harrowing. The second section was mostly unpleasant, "isn't this supposed to be a slasher flick?" When "Billy" and his bulging-in-all-the-right-places denims arrived in the third act, an antihero was born. Even though the movie isn't very good, the backlash didn't stop them from making Silent Night, Deadly Night Parts 2, 3, 4, &5.
ReplyDeleteHa ha, BryonByron! There were fewer of those as it went along as you doubtlessly discovered...
ReplyDeleteDan, I'm not a fan of them much either, actually. These days I avoid them like the plague (things like "Saw," "Hostel" etc...) but the '80s ones often had the added exploitation factor of cute guys with varying degrees of skin showing, so that makes them interesting on that level. And, yes, I did sit through several seasons of "American Horror Story" as well for the stars involved and the occasional Dylan McDermott butt/towel scenes et al...! I bailed soon after one season had people cutting off a person's skin and forcing them to eat it...! Really? No thanks. I love atmospheric horror like you mention, too.
SonofaBuck, I can see the Guy Stockwell thing! Agreed. When I watch movies from this era now, I sort of check out of the gore sequences and just tell myself that it's all just red corn syrup, etc... What that does many times is remove much of the (already limited!) emotional involvement, too, though. Because I'm stepping out of the experience for a reality check. Heigh ho...
Gingerguy, I hope you like it! I'm rather amazed that you are already familiar with Linnea Quigley! I had read the name, but she's not someone I was really fully aware of. She had a pretty long run as a "sexy" victim in things like this. Thanks!
A, glad you liked the leading man here. :-)
hsc, thanks for the extra info on Lilyan. That's quite a title! - "Lost, Lonely and Vicious!" Very '50s. Thank you for your kind words about the site, too.
josh, I hear ya. Makes me wish I'd have taken some photos of my better self to prove I wasn't always like "this!" LOLOL Oddly enough, RBW was on an episode of "Dynasty!" He was one of Alexis' parade of male secretaries, whose names she always forgot because they were constantly fired...! So Aaron Spelling obviously thought he was a nice bit of eye candy, too.
John, the drastic change in eye color rocked me more than anything when it came to the child actors...! As for the title/carol thing, someone probably (as I so often do) just wanted to do a play on words. People find the damnedest things to get up in arms about sometimes. Like I said, no one batted an eye about "Nightmare on Elm Street!" (Which I've actually never seen, believe it or not.)
Craig, I bought that on VHS many, many years ago, because I'm a huge Eleanor Parker fan and completist. It's a great little TV-movie! But to suggest that Eleanor, Jessica Walter, Jill Haworth and Sally Field all came out of the same womb was just hysterical to me!! Eleanor had just played Sally's mom in a teen druggie movie right before that, I believe! I love and adore so many TVMs from that period because they're usually so tight at 74 minutes or something like that. Less padding.
rigs-in-gear, I really agree with your assessment. That opening was pretty brutal! And the hell the poor kid endures at the orphanage...! And, yes, once Billy grew up and out, it shifted gears once more. There was hubbub over one of those sequels because Mickey Rooney starred in it. He'd been one of the outspoken haters of the first film, but then was featured in a sequel. But it's believed that he was not told it was part of that franchise until it was in the can and renamed... Thanks!
I knew this site was for me when I saw Donna Mills name in the sidebar,my mum was obsessed with her films in the 80's,I spent all week perusing this site and it's now a regular stop.
ReplyDeleteThe indepth stuff on Airport 77 esp Miss Lee Grant and Torch Song had me laughing as if someone had entered my brain.
mrripley, thanks so much and welcome to P.U. (<-- yep....! Didn't think that one out too well, did I? LOL) There's a TON of babbling here - 12 years' worth - so you have a lot to catch up on. I appreciate it!
ReplyDeleteJust now watching the Perry Mason episode in which Gary Lockwood plays a boxer. Alas, at the crucial ball-pop moment, a tasteful blur shielded our gaze. Thank heaven it is preserved here!
ReplyDeleteDan, this might not have been the post you intended that comment for... but in any case, how APPALLING that someone felt the need to do that. I mean many people who watched likely wouldn't even have taken notice in any case. And of those that would, what are they really seeing?? Stupid. It's not like his dong fell out onto the floor of the boxing ring. LOL
ReplyDelete